Geralt

Thank you for that Mike. Will post my results when I've done enough driving. I think I agree with your conclusion. A modest increase (2%) in the pence per mile cost of E5, is totally worth it given the peace of mind that there's no possibility of fuel system damage and likely better performance. Let's hope my 2.4L shows the same results. Cost for 63L Miles driven Pence per mile E10 £86.31 270 32.0 E5 £91.35 280 32.6 E5 vs. E10 increase 6% 4% 2%

My convertor moved the bolt hole from its original location rearward toward the tailgate strike plate. I just remove the trim panel covering the strike plate bolts with my hands and the spare wheel bolt is exposed.

Many thanks!

Thanks @Ldrego but do you have a model number please?

Anyone looking for a some reassurance that their Alphard will probably be fine on E10 might like to read the article here: https://andrewsjapanesecars.com/imported-toyota-use-e10-fuel/ Personally I'll be treating my 2003 2.4L 2AZ-FE to the occasional super-unleaded (E5) top up but other than that I'm not going to lose much sleep over it.

I think this reply deserves a thankyou. Thank you @nov Was wondering about this too.

That's great information, thank you so much!

Hello Hydro, Please could you tell me which Pioneer model number this please? Thank you.

Hi Picasso, I have a 2003 2.4L Alphard. I am considering the same Kenwood unit. I wondered if you would be kind enough to answer a couple of questions about it? 1) If you listen to the built in DAB/FM radio and then select Android Auto (e.g. for sat nav) does that mean the DAB radio is switched off and you can't listen to it while you're using Android Auto? 2) Did the original reversing camera work with this unit? 3) Any other tips? Thank you very much! Geralt.